‘LONDON’
BY WILLIAM BLAKE
Picture
Courtesy: Google Images
William
Blake’s (1757-1827) poem ‘London’ is a part of his most significant work - Songs of Innocence and Experience (1794).
This small but important poem is a comment of the poet on the oppressed,
painful, and poverty-ridden life of Londoners at a time when the Industrial
Revolution was being hailed as a panacea for all the economic and societal
challenges. The poem brings the readers face to face with the underside of all
the pomp and polish that the city of London stood for. The poem brings to the
fore all that was wrong with the city, in particular and with the society, in
general – dirt, filth, child labor, prostitution, oppression, misery.
London
was an important commercial center as well as metropolis at the time. Blake
looks at the flip side of this prosperity. The speaker of the poem takes a tour
of the city at night and lays bare the tyranny, oppression, desperation, dejection
that the underdogs were faced with.
I wander thro’ each charter’d street,
Near where the charter’d Thames does flow.
And mark in every face I meet
Marks of weakness, marks of woe.
Near where the charter’d Thames does flow.
And mark in every face I meet
Marks of weakness, marks of woe.
The speaker is wandering
through the streets of London at night. The very streets seem to be controlled
by state statutes. Not just the streets, but even the Thames also seems to have
been controlled according to the will of the state. This is something
extraordinary since it is almost impossible to control a river. But the idea conveyed
here is that everything is under the tight control of the law of the state and
freedom is only a meaningless word.
The last two lines of the
quatrain have a pun on the word ‘mark’
where the speaker says that as he walks down, he observes many people and notice
that their faces have ‘marks’ of ‘weakness and woe’. Their lives are miserable
and that misery is evident on their faces.
This quatrain sets the mood
and tone of the poem. It is not going to be about the glamour of this
metropolis. There is a not-so-glorious but real and shocking side to the city
that must be brought to light.
In every cry of every Man,
In every Infants cry of fear,
In every voice: in every ban,
The mind-forg'd manacles I hear.
The tone
gets intense in this quatrain. The speaker is deeply aggrieved at human misery
and predicament. He listens to the sounds of the city which are far from being
pleasant and reassuring. There are cries all around. Even infants are crying
and their cries are the cries of pain, suffering, and fear. The cries of pain
bring to his mind ‘the mind forged manacles’. These manacles of handcuffs are the
obstacles that have been created to hinder the habit of free thinking and
critical analysis. These are mental blocks that have obstructed the growth of
free thinking for so long that it has stopped coming by naturally to people.
How the Chimney-sweepers cry
Every blackning Church appalls,
And the hapless Soldiers sigh
Runs in blood down Palace walls
Continuing with the sounds of London, the
speaker notices that the chimney sweepers’ cries are putting the Church to
shame. The chimney sweepers were usually destitute children who were taken care
of by the Church. The Church has failed its duty and has engaged the children
in the dangerous and inhuman practice of cleaning chimneys. The Church is blackening
because it is a party to the dark and ugly practice of chimney sweeping. And
not just the Church, the whole society has failed these children.
Society has
failed the soldiers also whose sighs are flowing (figuratively) like blood from
the palace walls. Soldiers are fighting ‘wasteful wars’, battles that end up
taking their lives. All this for the palace, for the rulers. Their sighs go unheard.
Their sighs reflect in the blood that they are sacrificing for the palace i.e.
for the royal supremacy.
But most thro' midnight streets I hear
How the youthful Harlots curse
Blasts the new-born Infants tear
And blights with plagues the Marriage hearse.
But the most
agonizing and excruciating sound is the sound of young prostitute who curses
the whole society for her agony and torment. The infant who cries seems to be
the strumpet’s child. The very fact that there is prostitution is a reminder
that the institution of marriage is diseased, and has lost its sanctity. The metaphor
of hearse brings the image of the institution of marriage being dead, all
plagued and diseased because of prostitution.
ANALYSIS
The oppression of the underprivileged is
the main theme, the main focus of the writer. The industrial Revolution had
changed the basic fabric of society and was taking its toll on the lives of
impoverished masses. Capitalist owners of the means of production emerged as
the new feudal lords. Royalty was as indifferent as ever. The worst hit were
women, children, and soldiers. The poem reveals their anguish. The use of the
word ‘chartered’ in the first stanza indicates that all the laws were
inconsiderate of the plight of the poor and helpless. Even geographical
features like the Thames is brought under control. No one is happy here. All
the faces that he meets have marks of misery and distress.
The
repetition of ‘every’ in the second stanza emphasizes the all-pervasiveness of
this torment.
The very minds of people are controlled and freedom
is a sham. The society, religion, development – everything is to be held
accountable for the anguish of the masses. For survival, young children have to
sweep chimneys, a job that had serious repercussions on the health of the kids
and they died untimely. Chimneys, again, hint towards the rapid urbanization
and industrialization which is the root of this evil. Urban setting and misery
are suggested to be inversely proportional. Technologically, we have
progressed, but as humanity we have failed our duties.
Similarly, strumpets are leaving their infants
behind since they have to earn their living. Their curse is bighting the ‘marriage
hearse’. This phrase ‘marriage hearse’ is paradoxical as marriages are for
happiness and hearse is associated with death and gloom. By putting them
together the poet is indicating towards the meaninglessness or death of the
sacred institution of marriage.
Underneath
all the prosperity and charm of a metropolis like London, there lies a plethora
of diseases of a moral nature. The royalty, the aristocracy, the Church, the
lawmakers, the law enforcers – nobody seems to even acknowledge the existence of
these unfortunate sections.
The soldier, the harlot and the chimney sweeper –
all want to survive. Ironically, all three have to put their bodies at stake in
order to survive.
Defilement of childhood and Death are other themes of importance that the poet talks
about. Except the first stanza, there has been a mention of children,
particularly infants, in the poem. Infants open their eyes in this world of mechanized
humanity. Economic prosperity and greed have blinded the society towards the
torment of even infants. Their cries are not the innocent cries that we
associate with infancy. Their cries are a reminder to the State that things are
not right.
Young
children sweep chimneys instead of going to school. It’s not just their health
that is risked, it’s the future of humanity that is endangered. Young unmarried
harlots are mothers and they curse their infants. A society that cannot take
care of its children is doomed.
The structure
of the poem is very simple. The simplicity of structure complements the
complexity of images and ideas discussed in the poem. This sixteen line poem
has been divided into four quatrains of primarily iambic tetrameter. The third
stanza uses trochaic tetrameter. The rhyme scheme is ABAB.
The first stanza deals with how the city looks. The
rest of the poem concerns itself with the sounds of the city at night. The
selection of the time of night is significant because during daytime, these
sounds must drown in the humdrum of activity. They are most clearly perceptible
during night when chimney sweepers and soldiers are nursing their wounds, and
when the prostitutes are cursing their babies since it is business time for
them.
The speaker
of the poem is not the poet himself though the poem has been written in the
first person. The speaker has not been specified but he seems to be someone
with whom the poet shares a particular dislike for urbanization and
industrialization. The speaker is taking a walk through the streets of London
and this walk confirms his ideas about the condition of the less privileged
city-dwellers. Interestingly, more than the sights it is the sounds of the city
that catch his attention.